Spec Sheet Normaliser Open the app

Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5

Compared with the Dyness Powerbox F-2.5, the Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P has a 321% higher usable energy (9.6 kWh against 2.28 kWh), a 321% higher nominal energy (10.1 kWh against 2.4 kWh) and a 100% higher nominal voltage (96 V against 48 V).

Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5: datasheet values, one row per field
Battery storage
SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1PAlpha ESS
Powerbox F-2.5Dyness
Identity
Product nameSMILE-G3-BAT-10.1PPowerbox F-2.5
ManufacturerAlpha ESSDyness
ChemistryLFPLFP
Energy & power
Nominal energy10.1kWh (best)2.4kWh
Usable energy9.6kWh (best)2.28kWh
Max continuous charge power——
Max continuous discharge power—2.4kW
Electrical
Nominal voltage96V48V
Voltage range90–108V42–54V
Max continuous current52.5A—
Performance
Round-trip efficiency——
Depth of discharge95% (best)90%
Cycle life8000cycles (best)6000cycles
Operating temperature-10–50°C-20–55°C
Mechanical
Weight90kg47kg (best)
Dimensions W×D×H610 × 212 × 793 (W×D×H)mm555 × 210 × 928 (W×D×H)mm
IP ratingIP65IP65
Warranty & certification
Design life or warranty10years—
CertificationsIEC 62619, IEC 62040, UN 38.3UL 1973, IEC 62040, UN 38.3, CE

A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.

Compare your own datasheets

How to read these rows

Sources

Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.

More comparisons

More Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P comparisons

More Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 comparisons

All datasheet comparisons