Spec Sheet Normaliser Open the app

Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P vs Tesla Powerwall 3

Compared with the Tesla Powerwall 3, the Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P has a 31% lower weight (90 kg against 130 kg), a 25% lower nominal energy (10.1 kWh against 13.5 kWh) and a 9.4% higher max continuous current (52.5 A against 48 A).

Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P vs Tesla Powerwall 3: datasheet values, one row per field
Battery storage
SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1PAlpha ESS
Powerwall 3Tesla
Identity
Product nameSMILE-G3-BAT-10.1PPowerwall 3
ManufacturerAlpha ESSTesla
ChemistryLFP—
Energy & power
Nominal energy10.1kWh13.5kWh (best)
Usable energy9.6kWh—
Max continuous charge power—5kW
Max continuous discharge power—11.5kW
Electrical
Nominal voltage96V—
Voltage range90–108V—
Max continuous current52.5A48A
Performance
Round-trip efficiency——
Depth of discharge95%—
Cycle life8000cycles—
Operating temperature-10–50°C-20–50°C
Mechanical
Weight90kg (best)130kg
Dimensions W×D×H610 × 212 × 793 (W×D×H)mm1099 × 609 × 193mm
IP ratingIP65IP67
Warranty & certification
Design life or warranty10years10years
CertificationsIEC 62619, IEC 62040, UN 38.3UL 9540, UL 9540A, UL 1973, UN 38.3

A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.

Compare your own datasheets

How to read these rows

Sources

Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.

More comparisons

More Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P comparisons

More Tesla Powerwall 3 comparisons

All datasheet comparisons