Spec Sheet Normaliser Open the app

BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1 vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5

Compared with the Dyness Powerbox F-2.5, the BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1 has a 327% higher nominal voltage (204.8 V against 48 V), a 125% higher usable energy (5.12 kWh against 2.28 kWh) and a 94% higher weight (91 kg against 47 kg).

BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1 vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5: datasheet values, one row per field
Battery storage
Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1BYD
Powerbox F-2.5Dyness
Identity
Product nameBattery-Box Premium HVS 5.1Powerbox F-2.5
ManufacturerBYDDyness
ChemistryLFPLFP
Energy & power
Nominal energy—2.4kWh
Usable energy5.12kWh (best)2.28kWh
Max continuous charge power——
Max continuous discharge power—2.4kW
Electrical
Nominal voltage204.8V48V
Voltage range160–240V42–54V
Max continuous current25A—
Performance
Round-trip efficiency96%—
Depth of discharge—90%
Cycle life—6000cycles
Operating temperature-10–50°C-20–55°C
Mechanical
Weight91kg47kg (best)
Dimensions W×D×H762 × 585 × 298 (H×W×D)mm555 × 210 × 928 (W×D×H)mm
IP ratingIP55IP65
Warranty & certification
Design life or warranty10years—
CertificationsIEC 62619, UN 38.3, CEUL 1973, IEC 62040, UN 38.3, CE

A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.

Compare your own datasheets

How to read these rows

Sources

Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.

More comparisons

More BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1 comparisons

More Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 comparisons

All datasheet comparisons