Spec Sheet Normaliser Open the app

Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs GoodWe Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L

Compared with the GoodWe Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L, the Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 has a 56% lower nominal energy (2.4 kWh against 5.4 kWh), a 53% lower usable energy (2.28 kWh against 4.8 kWh) and an 18% lower weight (47 kg against 57 kg).

Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs GoodWe Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L: datasheet values, one row per field
Battery storage
Powerbox F-2.5Dyness
Lynx Home U LX U5.4-LGoodWe
Identity
Product namePowerbox F-2.5Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L
ManufacturerDynessGoodWe
ChemistryLFPLFP
Energy & power
Nominal energy2.4kWh5.4kWh (best)
Usable energy2.28kWh4.8kWh (best)
Max continuous charge power——
Max continuous discharge power2.4kW2.88kW
Electrical
Nominal voltage48V51.2V
Voltage range42–54V48–57.6V
Max continuous current—50A
Performance
Round-trip efficiency——
Depth of discharge90%—
Cycle life6000cycles—
Operating temperature-20–55°C-10–50°C
Mechanical
Weight47kg (best)57kg
Dimensions W×D×H555 × 210 × 928 (W×D×H)mm505 × 175 × 570 (W×D×H)mm
IP ratingIP65IP65
Warranty & certification
Design life or warranty——
CertificationsUL 1973, IEC 62040, UN 38.3, CEIEC 62619, UN 38.3, CE

A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.

Compare your own datasheets

How to read these rows

Sources

Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.

More comparisons

More Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 comparisons

More GoodWe Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L comparisons

All datasheet comparisons