Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs Tesla Powerwall 3
Compared with the Tesla Powerwall 3, the Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 has an 82% lower nominal energy (2.4 kWh against 13.5 kWh), a 79% lower max continuous discharge power (2.4 kW against 11.5 kW) and a 64% lower weight (47 kg against 130 kg).
| Battery storage | Powerbox F-2.5Dyness | Powerwall 3Tesla |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Product name | Powerbox F-2.5 | Powerwall 3 |
| Manufacturer | Dyness | Tesla |
| Chemistry | LFP | — |
| Energy & power | ||
| Nominal energy | 2.4kWh | 13.5kWh (best) |
| Usable energy | 2.28kWh | — |
| Max continuous charge power | — | 5kW |
| Max continuous discharge power | 2.4kW | 11.5kW |
| Electrical | ||
| Nominal voltage | 48V | — |
| Voltage range | 42–54V | — |
| Max continuous current | — | 48A |
| Performance | ||
| Round-trip efficiency | — | — |
| Depth of discharge | 90% | — |
| Cycle life | 6000cycles | — |
| Operating temperature | -20–55°C | -20–50°C |
| Mechanical | ||
| Weight | 47kg (best) | 130kg |
| Dimensions W×D×H | 555 × 210 × 928 (W×D×H)mm | 1099 × 609 × 193mm |
| IP rating | IP65 | IP67 |
| Warranty & certification | ||
| Design life or warranty | — | 10years |
| Certifications | UL 1973, IEC 62040, UN 38.3, CE | UL 9540, UL 9540A, UL 1973, UN 38.3 |
A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.
How to read these rows
Sources
Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.
More comparisons
More Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 comparisons
- Alpha ESS SMILE-G3-BAT-10.1P vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5
- BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 5.1 vs Dyness Powerbox F-2.5
- Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs Enphase IQ Battery 5P
- Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs GoodWe Lynx Home U LX U5.4-L
- Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs Pylontech US5000
- Dyness Powerbox F-2.5 vs Sungrow SBR064