Spec Sheet Normaliser Open the app

Pylontech US5000 vs Tesla Powerwall 3

Compared with the Tesla Powerwall 3, the Pylontech US5000 has a 71% lower weight (38 kg against 130 kg), a 64% lower nominal energy (4.8 kWh against 13.5 kWh) and a 50% higher design life or warranty (15 years against 10 years).

Pylontech US5000 vs Tesla Powerwall 3: datasheet values, one row per field
Battery storage
US5000Pylontech
Powerwall 3Tesla
Identity
Product nameUS5000Powerwall 3
ManufacturerPylontechTesla
Chemistry——
Energy & power
Nominal energy4.8kWh13.5kWh (best)
Usable energy4.56kWh—
Max continuous charge power—5kW
Max continuous discharge power—11.5kW
Electrical
Nominal voltage48V—
Voltage range44.5–53.5V—
Max continuous current—48A
Performance
Round-trip efficiency——
Depth of discharge95%—
Cycle life6000cycles—
Operating temperature-10–55°C-20–50°C
Mechanical
Weight38kg (best)130kg
Dimensions W×D×H442 × 420 × 161mm1099 × 609 × 193mm
IP ratingIP20IP67
Warranty & certification
Design life or warranty15years (best)10years
CertificationsUL 1973, IEC 62619, UN 38.3, CE, UKCAUL 9540, UL 9540A, UL 1973, UN 38.3

A dot marks the best number in a row: more energy, round-trip efficiency, depth of discharge, cycles and warranty; less weight. A dash means the value was not found in the datasheet's text.

Compare your own datasheets

How to read these rows

Sources

Values extracted from the manufacturers' published datasheets; verify against the source before relying on them.

More comparisons

More Pylontech US5000 comparisons

More Tesla Powerwall 3 comparisons

All datasheet comparisons